It is World Poverty Day!

I am not quite sure what means exactly but a quick search on the internet led me to this link. it would appear that the leaders of the main parties in the UK general elections are out and about spelling out exactly what their plans for developing countries will be once in power.

Some thing that caught my attention is David Cameron’s visit to a Islamic charity in Birmingham. Alongside him was Andrew Mitchell the Shadow Secretary for International Development, who was interviewed about the conservative policy on international policy.

I do agree with him that more has to be done to ensure that AID  gets through to those that need it the most. I also agree that we the tax payers should be told more about where our money goes and be shown the outcomes of this form intervention.

I however  question the wisdom behind what he called an “ex-factor” type  of voting that will see us the public deciding who in the developing world deserves our help!

If the current checks and balances of ensuring that money get to those that need are not working, is the answer hidden in changing how or to whom the AID is allocated?  Or is this a way of getting votes from the voting public? How would this actually work in public?

Is it time perhaps that the whole idea of AID was overhauled?

This year also sees the 10th anniversary of the Millennium development Goals but as discussed it would appear that it is unlikely that these will be met either.

Should this perhaps be the focus for Andrew Mitchell and his chums?

Do you know what World Poverty day means? I would love  to hear from you

Economic Migration

In the last post I looked at the issue of unfair trade agreements an their role in economic migration.  In this thread I would like to look at the value of economic migrants.

I has been a few days since my last post and in those days I watched an interesting documentary called The End of the Line. The documentary looked at two issues that I have written about here and the other is one of immigration. The fisher man from Senegal has been priced out of the market by European fishing companies who have been sold rights to fish here by the government, This has meant that his daily catch is only worth $6 and he spends $4 on that on fuel. he says he wants to provide for his family but cannot see how and the only option left to him is to make the dangerous journey to Europe. There is nothing left here for him.

Interestingly too, one of the professional  interviewed said that this is a growing trend in this part of Senegal but sadly whilst “they want our fish, we are not welcome in Europe” Unfair Trade terms?

Economic Migrants or the Diaspora are very useful to the economic development of their country of origin because of  the money they send home. Ireland is one such country that depended heavily on these remittances until recently. African countries rely heavily on these remittances too and in 2008 these amounted to $780 million dollars in Uganda alone. Those are staggering amounts of money to a country whose GDP was up until recently  made up of 70% of AID money.

There is a benefit too for the donor agencies, with the economic migrants remitting money to their countries of origin, in theory it should mean that AID to a given country may eventually reduce and thus ease the burden on it’s tax payers.  This is how it work in theory and the money remitted by the economic migrants is often much more than the AID a given country might receive. The reality however is that these remittances are not structured in such way as to aid development. instead the money is sent to family members for personal consumption

We have also  heard  cries of “they come here and take our jobs” my question why are these jobs available for the new comers to take?

The BBC carried out an experiment to dispel this myth once and for all, find out  what happened when immigrants were withdrawn from their jobs in Wisbech Cambridgeshire  here

Although the economic migrants will and may do jobs that the locals do not want to do there is no doubt that the increase in an area’s population will have an impact upon other resources such as health school, housing.

There is an indirect cost to the homelands of the economic migrants too known as the brain drain countries lose their skilled personnel to other countries and the imapct of such brain drain will vary from country to ocuntry with the least developed countries  suffering the most.

The  question is how do you balance all this out?

Have got a view on any of issues raised here, if so it will be great to hear from you

The forest would be saved if..

the community around it were able to link income generation and its preservation. This is the conclusion Rosemary Wallin yesterday when she dropped in for lunch.

Rosemary is getting ready for her PHd and her research into “luxury and handicrafts” led her to my website. She got in touch and I told her about my challenge of helping the women to come up with jewellery designs that are suitable for the British market
. Rosemary agreed to get involved and yesterday she travelled down from London for a meeting with me.

We spoke at length about the project and the materials the women use, in particular the sustainability of textile. We looked at African textiles BARK CLOTH and WILD SILK

As we spoke it dawned on us that the survival of both these textiles will depend on trees or a forest in the case of wild silk, unless the ancient forest of Madagascar are conserved it will not be possible to harvest the wild silk from those forest. We concluded if the community continue to earn an income from the silk they collect it will be in their interest to conserve these ancient forests our challenge therefore is to enable the community to bring their silk products to the market.

On the other hand in order to harvest bark cloth you need to protect the MUTUBA tree and in fact plant more and more of this type of tree. The harvesting process involves peeling off the bark and if you need to harvest again in future then you have to “nurse” the tree to ensure that it can produce the bark cloth again.You cannot cut down the tree!

If you are a regular here you may recall my conversation with a coffee grower in Uganda who was asked to give up his land for Pine tree planting. Could it be that the government is focusing on the wrong type of tree and that they would be better of encouraging the growing of the MUTUBA tree?

Could Rosemary consider sustainable textiles as part of her PHD, and perhaps work out a way the bark cloth for instance could be brought into mainstream use? This is a challenge she went away with amongst other things.

Can you help these communities conserve these ancient forests? A good start would be to order one of our wild silk scarves!

We considered too how much interest there is amongst the general population there is in learning about the process involved in producing what they wear today. Would people be willing to pay more for a product that helps protect/conserve an ancient forest?