#Post2015: Let them have good jobs

The Millennium Development Goals are coming to end in 2015 and questions have began about what should replace them.  I have attended a few such discussion panels and will be dipping in out and out the emerging themes from those panel discussions.

 

One such themes concerns jobs. In particular that the Post 2015 agenda should focus on the creation of good jobs. This gives rise to a few questions

  1. What does a “good  job” look like?
  2. Who is responsible for creating such a job?

The first question gives rise to another question that is to do with measuring and evaluation. Who will determine the quality of jobs that are created? Is this the job of Business, Governments, NGOs or individuals themselves?

These are questions for us to ponder  as the 2015 deadline approaches.

In this post I am concerned with a phenomena that if left unchecked will be the biggest challenge for us beyond 2015.

Rural to Urban Migration

I admit that I have not done any research in this area and therefore my knowledge is limited to observation of what is going on in Ruhanga an other such villages in Uganda.

Typical such villages  have no factories or formal employment and folk leave off the land. The men tend to leave as soon as they can, in  search of work in towns and cities. But this option, is not often available to women and girls who expected to remain and work the land.

 

In some cases women do make it into the cities and the situation there with respect to accessing jobs isn’t any better for them.  This is a confluence of reasons for this, but the most common one has to do with a lack of formal education, precisely that these women often do not have the level of education that would for instance enable them to access an office jobs.

The consequences of such circumstances unfolded before our very eyes in a Bangladeshi clothing factory a few weeks ago .

A cab driver in Uganda summed up the situation for women and girls in Uganda as follows

Without a job or home to go to, the girls end up in the slums of Kampala, where they become easy pickings for would be people traffickers, who sell them on to prostitution rings, those that are lucky might get a job as someone’s house maid. This guarantees shelter and food but not necessarily fair wages nor fair treatment. These are the sort of girls that used by gangs to steal from foreigners in restaurants, bars and clubs. to be frank with you, they have become a nusiance

 

With women and girls facing such circumstances, the UK’s Labour Party has called on government’s to rethink the Post 2015 . Ivan Lewis the Shadow Development Secretary for Labour for instance argues that it is not enough to simply focus on what the goals should be  and urges governments, experts, academics and NGOs to focus on Equality and to that end Labour has come up with what they are calling the Equality 2030 agenda.

But what does equality mean? Is there a universal description that is understood by all? Although this is desired, evidence points to an increasingly dived and unequal society in which the disparity between the haves and have nots is huge and growing by day giving rise to rural to urban migration witnessed in countries such as Uganda.

With all this mind, therefore where do we go from here?

Have you got a view? Join the conversation

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

International Women’s Day: The Thing About Women

Women Executive panel

Last Saturday 2 March 2013, I convened a meeting in Kampala the capital of Uganda, to explore the business case for women as part of global supply chains . The panelists were some of the most successful business women and executives the country has to offer including the Minister for Trade and Industry.

By the end of the day I came away feeling that the meeting had in fact raised more questions than it answered. And these are that ones that stood out for me

  1. Are women disadvantaged by their gender?
  2. Are women capable of empowering themselves or this is the job of men?
  3. Do women hold onto cultural practices that hold them back?
  4. What are women like as employers of other women? Are they for instance more understanding when it comes to issues of child care etc?
  5. Are women deserving of special treatment when it comes to global supply chains?
  6. Are women their own worst enemies?
  7. Do Multinational companies prefer to work with women?
  8. Are there gender barriers in business?
  9. Is the rural woman deserving of special treatment over an urban women in business?
  10. Should employers take extra steps to ensure that a woman’s income doesn’t end up in the man’s pocket/drinking den?
  11. What is happening in the Home? Are girls being raised with enough confidence in themselves and or their abilities?
  12. How about collaboration? Can women leverage their networks in order to supply into global chains or are they working in isolation?

 

Employees of Perfect Roses Uganda

What about the rural Woman? The Minister for Trade and Industry spoke passionately about the plight of the rural African woman and cited several challenges faced by the rural woman including cultural practices such as polygamous marriages, access to knowledge/information, financial training etc. The Minister challenged the audience to take action to address the plight of the rural woman.

But is the minister right to be concerned about the rural woman? I certainly think so. Whilst the urban woman has choices and is aware of her rights this isn’t necessarily the case for the rural women, who typically passes her days doing working the land for very little reward.  When this becomes too much to bear, the young women in particular give up and head to the cities. The city often has very little to offer this rural to urban migrant and according to one taxi driver this type of woman often turns to prostitution.

There seemed to be unified agreement that in order to adress some of these challenges, it is necessary to ensure that agriculture as seen and treated as a serious business and make it pay, this would in turn stem the rural to urban migration trends.

Young girls in rural areas should be supported to remain within the education system for as long as the boys are. It was further agreed that the education system should be examined to ensure that as well as academic grades, girls should acquire skills that would ensure their financial independence .

 

And then there is the media!

  1. Does the media give women a raw deal by promoting poor images of women?

Like I said I came away with more questions than answers, this is not such a bad things actually as it will force me to continue to explore the issues raised.

And the thing about women?  Are we really our own worst enemy?

Join the conversation 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Lonmin Mines deaths- is it time to rethink Corporate Social Responsibility #csr?

Authenticity in Corporate Social Responsibility

Authenticity in Corporate Social Responsibility (Photo credit: Geoff Livingston)

 

If you are a news junkie like me, you may have heard about the death of Platinum miners at the Lonmin mine in South Africa during a stand off between the Police and the miners who were on strike for various reasons including pay.  In the aftermath of their deaths there has been a call for the renationalization of the mines amongst other things.

 

I am not entirely convinced that this is necessarily a good idea as I suspect government is not always best placed to run the mines or that the problem is necessarily due to the fact that the mines are held privately.

 

Notwithstanding the practical reasons of why this is not a good idea these communities would lose some of the other benefits that are available through the Corporate Social Responsibility programmes. In and of it’s own this is not a good enough reason not to renationalize the mines but as I argued in SHOULD CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BE SCARPPED in some cases this is the only way that communities can access HIV medications, Education and other social services that are not currently being provided by governments. We therefore have a question to ponder- if the government/s is not currently providing social services where is the evidence that it would if the mines were nationalized?

 

Issues of inequality are deeply rooted in South Africa and most were highlighted in the recent BBC Africa Debate, speaker after speaker cited the fact that South Africa is dived along both colour and racial lines and that initiatives such as Black Economic Empowerment have only helped those black people that are already privileged, the rich and Politicians, moreover that there has been an explosion of desperately poor White South Africans.

 

Although this story happened in South Africa it could be anywhere else in Africa. Uganda for instance has discovered all manner of minerals and Oil. Who knows how that will unfold? Will the man in the street benefit directly from these riches in the ground or will it be concentrated in the hands of a few?

 

 

My suggestion would be to rethink the whole Corporate Social Responsibility (csr) notion as it relates to the mining industry and this would go beyond the provision of social services to include pay and job prospects for the miners. There are various processes that are involved in bringing precious metals/minerals to the market, however the people who take the most risk in this process are the least rewarded.

 

Why is that?

 

Surely this is not being Socially Responsible is it?

 

Yes, I know it is Business stupid and I do get it.

 

But unless the people who undertake the hardest work in the process of bringing these expensive metals/minerals to market are remunerated equitably I am afraid chances are there will be many more Lonmins in the future.

 

I would be very interested in views on this matter, as I suspect I have probably over simplified what is indeed a complex matter and perhaps one deserving some serious academic research

Enhanced by Zemanta