Should Corporate Social Responsibility be scrapped? #CSR


Or should we move beyond it?

Let’s begin with what Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is all about

For those that may not be familiar with this term, put simply CSR is about companies mostly big corporations like Coca Cola, Cadbury, or Vodaphone doing their bit for society or rather giving back some of their profits to society.

This does not necessarily have to be in the developing world, it might be staff in these corporations spending time in Inner City Schools or they can pay someone else to do it and tick a box that they have done it. But as this blog is about the developing world I will address this notion of CSR from that point of view.

Companies working in  the developing world are increasingly being called upon to move beyond CSR because
1. it makes good business sense to do so
2. breeds good relationships with the communities in which they work
This type of CSR involves more than visiting schools and in fact it may mean that the company has to build a school or a hospital for the community. Let’s say it is not cheap! Some companies have whole departments dedicated to their CSR programmes whilst others contract it out.

school building in Ruhanga SW Uganda

If you have got this far you are probably thinking well those giant corporations are taking out of those communities so it is only fair that they give back. I would agree with you and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that line of argument and at the risk of contradicting myself this is the only way a local community can benefit directly from the presence of these giant corporatios in their neighbourhood.

The flip side of this type of CSR is that

1. it creates dependence because
2. it is a form of Aid- that is one school or hospital that the government doesn’t have to  build- never mind maintain
3. it lets that government off the hook in terms of social services provision
4. Who determines on what gets on the agenda?
5. what happens when these companies pack and leave

Surely these are not strong enough reasons to scrap CSR? Perhaps not, Should we therefore move beyond CSR?

This is something that has left me a little confused and I am hoping that I have not confused you too. If companies are doing more than simply fetching raw materials from the developing world and are building schools and hospitals, one would argue that they have moved beyond the box ticking CSR as we know it. And that being the case what more can they do?

Depending on the nature of their business, they could look into other opportunities within the community that could lead to win win win situations e.g creating whole new product lines based on what is available in the community. SABMiller and Coca Cola have done just that in Uganda

But does any of this really help folk in Africa in real terms? After all those companies are not owned by the indigenous population and this means that company profits leave these communities and are enjoyed elsewhere.

In my opinion a good mix would be encouraging local enterprises that can create employment and perhaps a local brand of Corporate Social Responsibility.

What do you think?

#MDGs- the cameras are switched off now what?

A week ago all cameras were on UN Summit as the great and good convened in New York  to review the Millennium Development Goals or MDGs .

WOMEN OF KIREKA- PHOTO BY TMS RUGE

If you followed the news and discussions on the various social media platforms you would have noted that  opinions were divided. The key points of note were

  • More Aid is required
  • some countries especially in sub-saharan Africa are unlikely to meet the goals
  • the goals are not realistic and should be treated as mere aspirations
  • goals not far reaching as elements such as governance are missing

Just about the same time two stories broke regarding Bono, his fashion label as well as his ONE campaign. Rotten timing I would say for someone in his position. Nevertheless if this is what  folk like him that are on record as advocating for a fairer deal for Africans get up to when the cameras are switched what hope is there, if any of meeting the MDGs,

I am going to keep this very short as  I would to give you the reader especailly if you are a fellow African a chance to answer this question, because I believe that after so many years of aid getting pumped into Africa we are not getting anywhere near being self sustaining  if we need outsiders to come in and set us goals in spite of the wealth that we have on the continent. Are we perhaps asking ourselves the wrong questions?

What can we as Africans do for ourselves today, without Aid from the West?

Please leave your answer to this question or any other comments below

Do you know where Gordon Brown is?

Back in May 2010 Gordon Brown’s labour party lost power to a Conservative/Liberal Democratic coalition  and since then most of us haven’t seen nor heard from Mr Brown, he appeared to have dropped off the face of the earth!

It turns out that he is alive and kicking and unexpectedly turned up in Kampala the capital of Uganda to attend the 15th African Union Summit

Why? If you read this BBC report and are a cynic you would conclude that he is job hunting!  Please do forgive me but it does really sound that way. But who in Africa is Hiring? Can they afford him? Perhaps Libya or South Africa? Libya can certainly afford him but what sort of job would they offer him? Special envoy? Image consultantGordon Brown

One thing for sure Gordon Brown’s (GB) presence will boost Uganda’s confidence following the bombings on 11/7  in kampala that left 76 people dead and some badly injured!

He however made an interesting observation the “world should turn to Africa for future growth of the world economic” . Is this why the Chinese are all over Africa?

What did GB do about ensuring that African was treated as an equal economic partner and not simply as a continent from which to fetch raw materials and give hand outs to?

An observation that I made of GB he has a high sense of that which is fair and as Chancellor he appeared to be fighting Africa’s corner, although I would argue that he could have done more than throwing money at problems in Africa. For this reason he will be amongst friends at African Union summit and some will wish he was still Great Britain’s Prime Minister or at the very least Chancellor of the Exchequer . Mind you they need not worry as the Overseas Budget he left in place has been ring fenced.  I do suspect though that  GB may feel uneasy mixing with some who have not had the dignity to stand down when the electorate booted them out and are hanging on to power by the gun! This may not appeal to his values!

But what about the ICT industry in Africa? Is it really the key to unleashing African Growth?

The growth of ICT in Africa is very exciting indeed, the talent is certainly out there, it is certainly an area to watch!

So why is GB really in Africa?


Against Malaria