Dave calls an Olympic Food Summit


As the London Olympics come to a close David Cameron the UK’s Prime Minister has summoned World Leaders, International NGO’s and such like to a summit to discuss global hunger.


The lack of food is a topic I return to on this blog time and time again mostly because having grown up in Uganda I know what it is like to go hungry but also that it is something I can’t make sense of. Although this particular summit will focus on hunger and malnutrition in the developing world, Africa in particular, they are at least 1 million children going hungry right here in the UK .  Yes, that is right that many children go hungry right here in the first world.


But why is that? We have the most generous welfare system in the world. Is it possible that it is failing the most vulnerable in society? Are our social workers failing these families or have they been priced out of the food market? I sincerely don’t know but I am one those that find this fact staggering and indeed some in the UK are resentful of the fact that so much AID is sent abroad and yet they are people in need right here.  The rights and wrongs of this debate almost always depend on whom you are listening to as eel as your political persuasion.


Back to food shortage, another surprise that has been thrown up in the news headlines is that although India is one of the fastest growing economies in the world, it has the highest number of malnourished and starving children in the entire world.  How can this be, after all food shortages in the Sahel, Niger and the Horn of Africathat  are well documented and we have all seen the headlines on our TV sets? Is it possible that a country that has its own Aid program has more malnourished children than African countries?

Talking to people affected by drought in the '...

Talking to people affected by drought in the 'Horn of Africa' (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


The problem with food is those  have too much are obese whilst others have none and are dying of hunger. How can we get the balance right? On the face of it the answer appears very simple: move food from where there is plenty to where there is none! That being the case, why aren’t we  doing so?


In my minds eye, it boils down to WILL, this can be either political, social, economic and or technological will.


  1. Technology is very important in securing food, but is the North ready to share the technical know how with the South?
  2. The economics of food have to work for the poor as well as the markets. Does this explain why India and the UK have children going angry in spite of those countries apparent wealth? Should the West pay huge subsidies to its farmers to grow food for the sole purpose of using it as Food Aid?
  3. Political will, unlocks blockages in the food chain by harnessing innovation, investing in ideas to secure food
  4. Social- We should all be concerned about those going hungry and do what we can to ensure that this doesn’t become the norm


It all seems straightforward but I wonder why aren’t we doing it? Why do we allow food to be traded on world markets at prices that some in the world cannot afford causing them to die of hunger?

Initiative review

I recently became aware of an amazing product that almost encompasses all four points. If you are from Uganda or have travelled to Uganda you will have come across Uganda’s staple food MATOKE.

This is a green banana that is boiled or steamed and served with stew. Like all bananas its shelf life is limited and it has to be eaten fairly quickly preferably before it ripens. But a Ugandan woman set about changing this having observed how the life of a potato is extended using technology.  The President of Uganda sanctioned the project and it became known as the President’s Banana Initiative.  In applying technology to a simple banana in this way cuts out wastage, makes the banana more portable as such easier to take to market but also makes it easier to use in cases of emergencies.


The reason I shared this particular initiative is because whilst here in the west a lot of food is wasted between the supermarket- fridge and plate in most developing countries the wastage is between land and plate. This is due to lack of technology that would ensure value addition as well as preservation in order to prolong the shelf life of food. The consequence of this that folk have no way of  saving food for lean times.


I have raised some ethical questions in the post and I am keen to hear your views so over to you


Enhanced by Zemanta

Hunger in Somalia- the winners and losers

A news item keeps dropping on and off the headlines, first it was due to the phone hacking scandals here in the UK and now it is the hunt for Gaddafi and that story is to do with famine at the Horn of Africa

The story is however being kept alive and sadly in this case it appears to have a twist. We have all seen the starving children in make shift tents we have responded to the calls to give generously to prevent people at the Horn of Africa dying of hunger.

If you have been following other news you may have missed this story from ALJAZEERA. It is 25-30 minutes long so ensure that you have enough time to sit and watch it

If you don’t have the time to watch it the long and short of it is that the food that has been donated to the starving people of Somalia has ended up in the hands of business men who are selling it back to the hungry, in addition that this is going with the full knowledge of the WORLD FOOD ORGANISATION and some NGOS. According to the programme it is not entirely true that the militia group AL SHABAB has denied NGOs access to areas that badly need food Aid.

If you have managed to watch the video, I would like to invite you to debate the issues raised
1- should people profiteer from hunger
2. Who is based placed to get food to the starving?
3. Is it really better to send/give money to the starving than food?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Why do 60% of UK public think overseas Aid wasted?

Valerie Amos, Baroness Amos at the 2007 World ...

Image via Wikipedia

The British government pledged to ring fence its Overseas Aid of  0.7% of national income. To  date the British public continue to ask why is that? In fact in a recent BBC Radio 4 interview , Andrew Mitchell The Secretary of state for International Development DFID had to answer the question


Why do 60% of  UK public think overseas Aid is wasted? And if that is the case should we continue to send our hard earned cash overseas?

and his answer

If we do not send the money to help alleviate problems like poverty, extreme hunger, these problems will turn up on our door step

Does he have a point?


On the face of it he does. So the question is has our sending overseas Aid stopped these problems turning up on our door stop?

The answer is NO.


British people are generous and are quick to respond to calls of help when there is an emergency elsewhere and have responded generously to the crisis in the horn of Africa and that being the case why would 60% of them think that overseas Aid is wasted? This article in The Mail Online has some answers

I have previously asked the question Why do parts of  Africa remain desperately despite the Aid that we send? and in another post I asked why India, a country that reportedly has its own Overseas Aid program has more poor people than some parts of Africa?

This all sounds to me like either

  1. Mr Mitchell has not not been effective at getting his message out there
  2. or that he needs to show us the UK public where our money goes in real terms and unfortunately for some that will mean that some of those “problems” he mentioned during his radio interview do not continue to show up on our door step


What do you think?

I am going to keep this post short to encourage discussion and will return to the topic in the next post – but in the mean time do join the conversation and don’t forget to invite your friends


Enhanced by Zemanta